How has Agile evolved over the past twenty years? The Agile Manifesto was signed in 2001. Companies and teams have been discovering the agile framework and new ways to work for quite a while. What did the signers get right, and what could have been improved? What parts of agile thinking may have been lost along the way and where are we going next?
Much has been written about quality and risk management from the perspectives of organizations that design, develop, and implement software systems. However, many enterprises no longer build software systems internally but, instead, acquire them from contractors.
Have your retrospectives lost their fizz? Don't lose heart! Watch the replay of this PNSQC webinar to find out how you can create conditions that keep your agile practices moving forward.
Join our special guest speaker Jan Jaap Cannegieter as we wrap up the CFP for PNSQC 2019. Jan Jaap will discuss how to improve your exploratory testing using less preparation but more creativity!
How do we mitigate the uncertainties that are introduced by using Agile on projects? In this webinar, PNSQC’s Philip Lew and Ying Ki Kwong from Oregon’s Office of the State CIO discuss agile risk management and uncertainty. Listen to what these experts have to say, and you’ll learn about risks you never thought of and see how you can manage or avoid them entirely.
PNSQC started the 2019 conference season with a Culture Jam at Intel, Ronler Acres. Topics included the Improvement Kata; using Agile methodologies in public education; building a quality department; maturity matrices for monitoring system uptime; and the history and impact of the Intel Software Quality group.
PNSQC started the 2019 conference season with a Culture Jam at Intel, Ronler Acres. Topics included the Improvement Kata; using Agile methodologies in public education; building a quality department; maturity matrices for monitoring system uptime; and the history and impact of the Intel Software Quality group.
Ever sit in a strategy review session and get little or no participation from others? Or feel like you left a planning session with a different understanding of what was agreed to?
